Shunt infection prevention practices in Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network-Quality: a new quality improvement network for hydrocephalus management.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge-based tools used to standardize perioperative care, such as the shunt infection prevention protocol of the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN), have demonstrated their ability to reduce surgeon-based and center-based variations in outcomes and improve patient care. The mere presence of high-quality evidence, however, does not necessarily translate into improved patient outcomes owing to the implementation gap. To advance understanding of how knowledge-based tools are being utilized in the routine clinical care of children with hydrocephalus, the HCRN-Quality (HCRNq) network was started in 2019. With a focus on CSF shunt infection, the authors present baseline data regarding CSF shunt infection rates and current shunt infection prevention practices in use at HCRNq sites. METHODS: Baseline shunt surgery practices, infection rate, and risk factor data were prospectively collected within HCRNq. No standard infection protocol was recommended, but site use of a protocol was implied if at least 3 of 6 common shunt infection prevention practices were used in > 80% of shunt surgical procedures. Univariable and multivariable analyses of shunt infection risk factors were performed. RESULTS: Thirty sites accrued data on 2437 procedures between November 2019 and June 2021. The unadjusted infection rate across all sites was 3.9% (range 0%-13%) and did not differ among shunt insertion, shunt revision, or shunt insertion after infection. Protocol use was implied for only 15/30 centers and 60% of shunt operations. On univariable analysis, iodine/DuraPrep (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.88, p = 0.02) and the use of an antibiotic-impregnated catheter in any segment of the shunt (or both) decreased infection risk (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.82, p = 0.01). Iodine-based prep solutions (OR 0.56, 95% 0.36-0.86, p = 0.02) and the use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.81, p = 0.01) retained significance in the multivariable model, but no relationship between protocol use and infection risk was demonstrated in this baseline analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated that children undergoing CSF shunt surgery at HCRNq sites share similar demographic characteristics with other large North American multicenter cohorts, with similar observed baseline infection rates and risk factors. Many centers have implemented standardized shunt infection prevention practices, but considerable practice variation remains. As such, there is an opportunity to decrease shunt infection rates in these centers through continued standardization of care.

Survey of United States neurosurgeons on firearm injury prevention.

OBJECTIVE: Firearm-related injuries and deaths are an endemic problem in the US, posing a burden on the healthcare system with significant social and economic consequences. As front-line care providers for these patients, neurosurgeons are both knowledgeable about these injuries and credible messengers in the public discussion of ways to reduce firearm injuries. The purpose of this study was to explore US-based neurosurgeons' views and behaviors regarding firearms to understand and define a potential role for neurosurgical organizations in advocacy efforts to reduce firearm death and injuries. METHODS: The authors conducted an anonymous survey of US neurosurgeons using the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) member database from April to June 2023. The 22-question survey included questions related to firearm ownership, personal views on firearms, and support for both general and policy-specific advocacy efforts to reduce firearm deaths and injuries. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 20.7%, with 1568 of the 7587 members invited completing the survey. The survey completion rate was 93.4%, with 1465 of the 1568 surveys completed and included in this analysis. The majority of respondents were male (raw: 81.7%; weighted 81.1%), White (raw: 69.7%; weighted 70.2%), and older than 50 years (raw: 56.2%; weighted: 54%). Most respondents reported treating patients with firearm injuries (raw: 83.3%; weighted: 82%), 85.5% (weighted: 85.1%) had used a firearm, and 42.4% (weighted: 41.5%) reported owning a firearm. Overall, 78.8% (weighted: 78.7%) of respondents felt that organized neurosurgery should participate in advocacy efforts. When examining individual policies, those that restrict the acquisition of firearms garnered the support of at least 65% of respondents, while nonrestrictive policies were supported by more than 75% of respondents. Free-text responses provided insight into both motivations for and objections to organizational advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of US-based neurosurgeons support involvement in advocacy efforts to reduce firearm deaths and injuries. Themes expressed by members both supporting and objecting to advocacy provide insight into approaches that could ensure broad support. Neurosurgical organizations such as the AANS and Congress of Neurological Surgeons may use the results of this survey to make informed decisions regarding involvement in advocacy efforts on behalf of their membership to lessen the burden of firearm injury in the US.

Anticoagulation for the treatment of septic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the setting of pediatric sinogenic and otogenic intracranial infections.

OBJECTIVE: Septic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a recognized complication of pediatric sinogenic and otogenic intracranial infections. The optimal treatment paradigm remains controversial. Proponents of anticoagulation highlight its role in preventing thrombus propagation and promoting recanalization, while others cite the risk of hemorrhagic complications, especially after a neurosurgical procedure for an epidural abscess or subdural empyema. Here, the authors investigated the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of pediatric patients with sinogenic or otogenic intracranial infections and a septic CVST. METHODS: All patients 21 years of age or younger, who presented with an intracranial infection in the setting of sinusitis or otitis media and who underwent neurosurgical treatment at Connecticut Children's, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, or Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago from March 2015 to March 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were systematically collated. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were treated for sinusitis-related and/or otitis media-related intracranial infections during the study period, 15 (15.6%) of whom were diagnosed with a CVST. Of the 60 patients who presented prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 6 (10.0%) were diagnosed with a septic CVST, whereas of the 36 who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic, 9 (25.0%) had a septic CVST (p = 0.050). The superior sagittal sinus was involved in 12 (80.0%) patients and the transverse and/or sigmoid sinuses in 4 (26.7%). Only 1 (6.7%) patient had a fully occlusive thrombus. Of the 15 patients with a septic CVST, 11 (73.3%) were initiated on anticoagulation at a median interval of 4 (IQR 3-5) days from the most recent neurosurgical procedure. Five (45.5%) patients who underwent anticoagulation demonstrated complete recanalization on follow-up imaging, and 4 (36.4%) had partial recanalization. Three (75.0%) patients who did not undergo anticoagulation demonstrated complete recanalization, and 1 (25.0%) had partial recanalization. None of the patients treated with anticoagulation experienced hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Septic CVST is frequently identified among pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention for sinogenic and/or otogenic intracranial infections and may have become more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anticoagulation can be used safely in the acute postoperative period if administered cautiously, in a monitored setting, and with interval cross-sectional imaging. However, some patients exhibit excellent outcomes without anticoagulation, and further studies are needed to identify those who may benefit the most from anticoagulation.

Natural history of mild trigonocephalic deformities.

OBJECTIVE: Ridging along the metopic suture line can be a common cause of concern for parents and has been theorized to represent a mild form of trigonocephaly, a cranial deformity associated with risks of negative cosmetic outcomes, if not surgically corrected. Yet the literature contains sparse reports of long-term cosmetic results or expectations for infants with isolated metopic ridging compared with those with severe trigonocephaly, or even what objective metrics discriminate isolated metopic ridging from severe trigonocephaly. Therefore, the authors' goals for this study were to 1) quantify the degree of frontal deformity among patients with metopic ridge, metopic craniosynostosis, and normocephalic head shapes; and 2) document the natural history of frontal deformities in isolated metopic ridge patients in the 1st year of life. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with normocephalic head shapes, metopic ridges, and metopic craniosynostoses who presented at < 1 year of age to the Connecticut Children's neurosurgery clinic from January 2019 to December 2021. Data were collected regarding demographics and photograph-based craniometrics. RESULTS: A total of 212 normocephalic, 34 metopic ridge, and 29 metopic craniosynostosis patients were included. Both the normocephalic and metopic ridge groups had a significantly higher anterior arc angle (AAA) value compared with the metopic craniosynostosis group (p < 0.0001). The AAA did not differ significantly among normocephalic patients and those with ridging. Over the course of 1 year of follow-up, patients with metopic ridging demonstrated a slight decrease in AAA values, but overall remained within the same range as normocephalic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Photograph-based craniometrics suggest that metopic ridge patients with frontal bone angulations > 2.2 radians have a mild degree of frontal constriction that does not significantly worsen over the 1st year of life.

Telemedicine Utilization in an Outpatient Pediatric Neurosurgical Clinic: A Prospective Survey of Patient and Family Preferences.

OBJECTIVE: After becoming widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine continues to play an important role in outpatient neurosurgical care. Nevertheless, the factors that influence individual decisions to choose telemedicine versus in-person appointments remain understudied. Here, we performed a prospective survey of pediatric neurosurgical patients and caregivers presenting for telemedicine or in-person outpatient visits, to identify factors associated with appointment choice. METHODS: All patients and caregivers with an outpatient pediatric neurosurgical encounter at Connecticut Children's between January 31st and May 20th, 2022, were invited to participate in this survey. Data related to demographics, socioeconomics, technological access, COVID-19 vaccination status, and appointment preferences were collected. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 858 unique pediatric neurosurgical outpatient encounters (86.1% in-person and 13.9% telemedicine). A total of 212 (24.7%) respondents completed the survey. Those with a telemedicine appointment were more likely to be white (P = 0.005), not Hispanic or Latino (P = 0.020), have private insurance (P = 0.003), be established patients (P < 0.001), have a household income >$80,000 (P = 0.005), and have caregivers who completed a 4-year college degree (P < 0.001). Those who were seen in-person cited the patient's condition, quality of care, and communication as important factors, whereas those who were seen via telemedicine cited time, travel, and convenience. CONCLUSIONS: While convenience influences some to choose telemedicine, concerns regarding the quality of care persist among those who prefer in-person encounters. Recognizing these factors will minimize barriers to care, better define the appropriate populations/contexts for each encounter type, and improve the integration of telemedicine within an outpatient neurosurgical setting.

Incorporation of a biparietal narrowing metric to improve the ability of machine learning models to detect sagittal craniosynostosis with 2D photographs.

OBJECTIVE: Sagittal craniosynostosis is the most common form of craniosynostosis and typically results in scaphocephaly, which is characterized by biparietal narrowing, compensatory frontal bossing, and an occipital prominence. The cephalic index (CI) is a simple metric for quantifying the degree of cranial narrowing and is often used to diagnose sagittal craniosynostosis. However, patients with variant forms of sagittal craniosynostosis may present with a "normal" CI, depending on the part of the suture that is closed. As machine learning (ML) algorithms are developed to assist in the diagnosis of cranial deformities, metrics that reflect the other phenotypic features of sagittal craniosynostosis are needed. In this study the authors sought to describe the posterior arc angle (PAA), a measurement of biparietal narrowing that is obtained with 2D photographs, and elucidate the role of PAA as an adjuvant to the CI in characterizing scaphocephaly and the potential relevance of PAA in new ML model development. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 1013 craniofacial patients treated during the period from 2006 to 2021. Orthogonal top-down photographs were used to calculate the CI and PAA. Distribution densities, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and chi-square analyses were used to describe the relative predictive utility of each method for sagittal craniosynostosis. RESULTS: In total, 1001 patients underwent paired CI and PAA measurements and a clinical head shape diagnosis (sagittal craniosynostosis, n = 122; other cranial deformity, n = 565; normocephalic, n = 314). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the CI was 98.5% (95% confidence interval 97.8%-99.2%, p < 0.001), with an optimum specificity of 92.6% and sensitivity of 93.4%. The PAA had an AUC of 97.4% (95% confidence interval 96.0%-98.8%, p < 0.001) with an optimum specificity of 94.9% and sensitivity of 90.2%. In 6 of 122 (4.9%) cases of sagittal craniosynostosis, the PAA was abnormal while the CI was normal. This means that adding a PAA cutoff branch to a partition model increases the detection of sagittal craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both CI and PAA are excellent discriminators for sagittal craniosynostosis. Using an accuracy-optimized partition model, the addition of the PAA to the CI increased model sensitivity compared to using the CI alone. Using a model that incorporates both CI and PAA could assist in the early identification and treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis via automated and semiautomated algorithms that utilize tree-based ML models.

Changes in the epidemiology of pediatric sinogenic and otogenic intracranial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single-institution study.

OBJECTIVE: Focal intracranial infections (epidural abscesses, subdural empyemas, and intraparenchymal abscesses) are uncommon complications of sinusitis and otitis media but can be associated with significant morbidity. Treatment typically requires neurosurgical and otolaryngological interventions in combination with antibiotic treatment. Historically, children have presented to the authors' pediatric referral center with sinusitis- or otitis media-related intracranial infections in low numbers. However, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of intracranial pyogenic complications has increased at this center. The objective of this study was to compare the epidemiology, severity, microbial causes, and management of pediatric sinusitis- and otitis-related intracranial infections in the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: All patients 21 years of age or younger who presented with an intracranial infection in the setting of sinusitis or otitis media and who underwent neurosurgical treatment at Connecticut Children's from January 2012 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were systematically collated, and variables before and during COVID-19 were compared statistically. RESULTS: Overall, 18 patients were treated for sinusitis-related (n = 16) or otitis media-related (n = 2) intracranial infections during the study period. Ten patients (56%) presented from January 2012 to February 2020, none from March 2020 to June 2021, and 8 (44%) from July 2021 to December 2022. There were no significant demographic differences between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohorts. The 10 patients in the pre-COVID-19 cohort underwent a total of 15 neurosurgical and 10 otolaryngological procedures, while the 8 patients in the COVID-19 cohort underwent a total of 12 neurosurgical and 10 otolaryngological procedures. Surgically obtained wound cultures yielded a variety of organisms; Streptococcus constellatus/S. anginosus/S. intermedius were more prevalent in the COVID-19 cohort (87.5% vs 0%, p < 0.001) as was Parvimonas micra (62.5% vs 0%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: At an institutional level, there has been an approximately threefold increase in cases of sinusitis- and otitis media-related intracranial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multicenter studies are needed to confirm this observation and to investigate whether the mechanisms of infection are related directly to SARS-CoV-2, changes in the respiratory flora, or delayed care. The next steps will include expansion of this study to other pediatric centers throughout the United States and Canada.

Clinical metrics and tools for provider assessment and tracking of trigonocephaly.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative measurements of trigonocephaly can be used to characterize and track this phenotype, which is associated with metopic craniosynostosis. Traditionally, trigonocephaly metrics were extracted from CT scans; however, this method exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Three-dimensional optical scans are another option but are not routinely available in most outpatient settings. Recently, the authors developed semiautomated artificial intelligence algorithms that extract craniometric data from orthogonal 2D photographs. Although 2D photographs are safe, inexpensive, and straightforward to obtain, the accuracy of photograph-based craniometrics in comparison to CT and 3D optical scan correlates has not been established. In this study the authors compared the classification power of 2D photograph-based metrics of trigonocephaly with four CT-based metrics and one 3D optical scan-based metric in a heterogeneous series of patients who presented to an outpatient craniofacial clinic. METHODS: In this study the authors performed retrospective craniometric analyses of patient 2D photographs, 3D optical scans, and CT scans. Imaging-derived craniometrics include the 2D photograph-based anterior arc angle (AAA2D-photo), anterior-posterior ratio (APR2D-photo), and anterior-middle ratio (AMR2D-photo); the CT-based anterior arc angle (AAACT), metopic index (MICT), endocranial-bifrontal angle (eBFACT), and interfrontal angle (IFACT); and the 3D optical scan-based anterior arc angle (AAA3D-optical). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) were used to identify craniometrics strongly descriptive of trigonocephaly. Interrater comparisons were made between paired trigonocephaly measurements obtained from photographs and either CT scans or 3D optical scans. RESULTS: There were 13 photograph-based and CT-based pairs and 22 paired measurements from 2D photographs and 3D optical scans. AAA displayed the strongest classification capacity across all three imaging modalities. Significant agreement was observed between AAACT and AAA2D-photo (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68 [95% CI 0.24-0.89], p = 0.0035), and AAA3D-optical and AAA2D-photo (ICC = 0.70 [95% CI 0.41-0.87], p < 0.0001). There was no significant correlation between APR2D-photo or AMR2D-photo and conventional CT-based metrics describing longitudinal width ratios (MICT). CONCLUSIONS: Photograph-based craniometrics are powerful tools that can be used to quantify the severity of trigonocephaly and exhibit high concordance with standard measurements derived from CT scans and 3D optical scans. The authors developed and freely share a research-use application to calculate trigonocephaly metrics from 2D photographs. Given the availability of digital photography, lack of ionizing radiation, and low cost of photograph-based craniometric derivation, this technique may be useful to supplement routine ambulatory care and objectively track outcomes following treatment.

Building consensus for the medical management of children with moderate and severe acute spinal cord injury: a modified Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the medical management of children with moderate and severe acute spinal cord injury (SCI) during their initial inpatient hospitalization. This impetus for the study was based on the AANS/CNS guidelines for pediatric SCI published in 2013, which indicated that there was no consensus provided in the literature describing the medical management of pediatric patients with SCIs. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary group of 19 physicians, including pediatric neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and intensivists, were asked to participate. The authors chose to include both complete and incomplete injuries with traumatic as well as iatrogenic etiologies (e.g., spinal deformity surgery, spinal traction, intradural spinal surgery, etc.) due to the overall low incidence of pediatric SCI, potentially similar pathophysiology, and scarce literature exploring whether different etiologies of SCI should be managed differently. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on the responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final meeting was held virtually to generate final consensus statements. RESULTS: Following the final Delphi round, 35 statements reached consensus after modification and consolidation of previous statements. Statements were categorized into the following eight sections: inpatient care unit, spinal immobilization, pharmacological management, cardiopulmonary management, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, genitourinary management, gastrointestinal/nutritional management, and pressure ulcer prophylaxis. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: General management strategies were similar for both iatrogenic (e.g., spinal deformity, traction, etc.) and traumatic SCIs. Steroids were recommended only for injury after intradural surgery, not after acute traumatic or iatrogenic extradural surgery. Consensus was reached that mean arterial pressure ranges are preferred for blood pressure targets following SCI, with goals between 80 and 90 mm Hg for children at least 6 years of age. Further multicenter study of steroid use following acute neuromonitoring changes was recommended.

Developing consensus for the management of pediatric cervical spine disorders and stabilization: a modified Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spine disorders in children are relatively uncommon; therefore, paradigms for surgical and nonsurgical clinical management are not well established. The purpose of this study was to bring together an international, multidisciplinary group of pediatric cervical spine experts to build consensus via a modified Delphi approach regarding the clinical management of children with cervical spine disorders and those undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to identify consensus statements for the management of children with cervical spine disorders requiring stabilization. A survey of current practices, supplemented by a literature review, was electronically distributed to 17 neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons experienced with the clinical management of pediatric cervical spine disorders. Subsequently, 52 summary statements were formulated and distributed to the group. Statements that reached near consensus or that were of particular interest were then discussed during an in-person meeting to attain further consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). RESULTS: Forty-five consensus-driven statements were identified, with all participants willing to incorporate them into their practice. For children with cervical spine disorders and/or stabilization, consensus statements were divided into the following categories: A) preoperative planning (12 statements); B) radiographic thresholds of instability (4); C) intraoperative/perioperative management (15); D) postoperative care (11); and E) nonoperative management (3). Several important statements reaching consensus included the following recommendations: 1) to obtain pre-positioning baseline signals with intraoperative neuromonitoring; 2) to use rigid instrumentation when technically feasible; 3) to provide postoperative external immobilization for 6-12 weeks with a rigid cervical collar rather than halo vest immobilization; and 4) to continue clinical postoperative follow-up at least until anatomical cervical spine maturity was reached. In addition, preoperative radiographic thresholds for instability that reached consensus included the following: 1) translational motion ≥ 5 mm at C1-2 (excluding patients with Down syndrome) or ≥ 4 mm in the subaxial spine; 2) dynamic angulation in the subaxial spine ≥ 10°; and 3) abnormal motion and T2 signal change on MRI seen at the same level. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the authors have demonstrated that a multidisciplinary, international group of pediatric cervical spine experts was able to reach consensus on 45 statements regarding the management of pediatric cervical spine disorders and stabilization. Further study is required to determine if implementation of these practices can lead to reduced complications and improved outcomes for children.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Primary Treatment of a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is becoming increasingly studied as a safe, effective treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in adults. Among pediatric patients, however, MMA embolization for cSDH has been rarely described, and the potential benefit of this approach for pediatric patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature and identify cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH. We also report our experience with pediatric MMA embolization. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH. Inclusion criteria included English language availability and pediatric age defined as less than 18 years. A pediatric patient treated with MMA embolization was also identified at our institution. RESULTS: Five cases of pediatric MMA embolization for cSDH were identified in the literature. Two were associated with arachnoid cysts, 2 with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy, and 1 with abusive head trauma. There were no adverse events, and all patients demonstrated clinical and radiological improvement on follow-up. At our institution, a previously healthy 8-year-old male was found to have a right-sided acute-on-chronic SDH during a headache evaluation. A diagnostic angiogram was performed to rule out a dural arteriovenous fistula, and right-sided MMA embolization was performed concurrently. Rapid clinical and radiological improvement was observed, with complete resolution by 6 months. CONCLUSION: MMA embolization may represent a treatment option for pediatric patients with cSDH.

Early experience with targeted therapy as a first-line adjuvant treatment for pediatric low-grade glioma.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) frequently exhibit dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Targeted therapies, including mutant BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitors (trametinib), have shown promise in patients in whom conventional chemotherapy has failed. However, few studies have investigated the use of targeted therapy as a first-line treatment for pLGG. Here, the authors reviewed their institutional experience with using a personalized medicine approach to patients with newly diagnosed pLGGs. METHODS: All pediatric patients at the authors' institution who had been treated with dabrafenib or trametinib for pLGG without first receiving conventional chemotherapy or radiation were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent targeted therapy as a first-line treatment for pLGG. Five patients had a BRAF alteration (1 with a BRAFV600E mutation, 4 with a KIAA1549:BRAF fusion), and 3 patients had an NF1 mutation. One of the 8 patients was initially treated with dabrafenib, and trametinib was added later. Seven patients were initially treated with trametinib; of these, 2 later transitioned to dual therapy, whereas 5 continued with trametinib monotherapy. Six patients (75%) demonstrated a partial response to therapy during their treatment course, whereas stable disease was identified in the remaining 2 patients (25%). One patient experienced mild disease progression after completing a course of trametinib monotherapy, but ultimately stabilized after a period of close observation. Another patient experienced tumor progression while on dabrafenib, but subsequently responded to dual therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. The most common adverse reactions to targeted therapy were cutaneous toxicity (100%) and diarrhea (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted therapies have the potential to become a standard treatment option for pLGG due to their favorable toxicity profile and oral route of administration. This case series provides preliminary evidence that targeted therapies can induce an early disease response as a first-line adjuvant treatment; however, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term durability and safety.

Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm: neurosurgical experience and transformative legacy for operational medicine.

Operation Desert Storm (ODS) was an astounding success for combat arms and logistical units of the US Military. In contrast, Department of Defense (DOD) medical units struggled to keep pace with combat operations and were fortunate that casualty estimates for a Cold War-era battle failed to materialize. The medical support plan included a large contingent of active-duty and reserve neurosurgeons in anticipation of care requirements for more than 500,000 deploying service members engaged in a large-scale combat operation. Here, the authors review the clinical experience and operational challenges encountered by neurosurgeons deployed in support of this conflict and discuss legacies of ODS for both surgeons and the military medical system.

Family-acquired photographs for the evaluation of pediatric head shape via telemedicine: an analysis of photograph quality.

OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine can be an effective tool for the evaluation of the pediatric patient with a cranial deformity, but it increases the reliance of neurosurgical providers on data provided by patients and families. Family-acquired photographs, in particular, can be used to augment the evaluation of pediatric head shape abnormalities via telemedicine, but photographs of sufficient quality are necessary. Here, the authors systematically reviewed the quality and utility of family-acquired photographs for patients referred to their pediatric neurosurgery clinic for telemedicine-based head shape evaluations. METHODS: All telemedicine encounters that were completed for head shape abnormalities at the authors' institution between May 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Instructions were sent to families prior to each visit with examples of ideal photographs. Three orthogonal views of the patient's head-frontal, lateral, and vertex-were requested. Data were collected regarding demographics, diagnosis, follow-up, and photograph quality. Quality variables included orthogonality of each requested view, appropriate distance, appropriate lighting, presence of distracting elements, and whether hair obscured the head shape. RESULTS: Overall, 565 patients had 892 visits during the study period. A total of 1846 photograph requests were made, and 3335 photographs were received for 829 visits. Of 2676 requested orthogonal views, 1875 (70%) were received. Of these, 1826 (97%) had adequate lighting, 1801 (96%) had appropriate distance, and 1826 (97%) had no distracting features. Hair did not obscure the head shape on the vertex view in 557 visits with orthogonal vertex views (82%). In-person follow-up was requested for further medical evaluation in 40 visits (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The family-acquired photographs in this series demonstrated high rates of adequate lighting and distance, without distracting features. Lack of orthogonality and obscuration of the head shape by hair, however, were more common issues. Family education prior to the visit may improve the quality of family-acquired photographs but requires an investment of time by medical staff. Efforts to further improve photographic quality will facilitate efforts to perform craniometric evaluations through telemedicine visits.

Hydrocephalus surveillance following CSF diversion: a modified Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term follow-up is often recommended for patients with hydrocephalus, but the frequency of clinical follow-up, timing and modality of imaging, and duration of surveillance have not been clearly defined. Here, the authors used the modified Delphi method to identify areas of consensus regarding the modality, frequency, and duration of hydrocephalus surveillance following surgical treatment. METHODS: Pediatric neurosurgeons serving as institutional liaisons to the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN), or its implementation/quality improvement arm (HCRNq), were invited to participate in this modified Delphi study. Thirty-seven consensus statements were generated and distributed via an anonymous electronic survey, with responses structured as a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A subsequent, virtual meeting offered the opportunity for open discussion and modification of the statements in an effort to reach consensus (defined as ≥ 80% agreement or disagreement). RESULTS: Nineteen pediatric neurosurgeons participated in the first round, after which 15 statements reached consensus. During the second round, 14 participants met virtually for review and discussion. Some statements were modified and 2 statements were combined, resulting in a total of 36 statements. At the conclusion of the session, consensus was achieved for 17 statements regarding the following: 1) the role of standardization; 2) preferred imaging modalities; 3) postoperative follow-up after shunt surgery (subdivided into immediate postoperative imaging, delayed postoperative imaging, routine clinical surveillance, and routine radiological surveillance); and 4) postoperative follow-up after an endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Consensus could not be achieved for 19 statements. CONCLUSIONS: Using the modified Delphi method, 17 consensus statements were developed with respect to both clinical and radiological follow-up after a shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. The frequency, modality, and duration of surveillance were addressed, highlighting areas in which no clear data exist to guide clinical practice. Although further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of hydrocephalus surveillance, the current study provides a framework to guide future efforts to develop standardized clinical protocols for the postoperative surveillance of patients with hydrocephalus. Ultimately, the standardization of hydrocephalus surveillance has the potential to improve patient care as well as optimize the use of healthcare resources.

Machine Learning-Driven Clinical Image Analysis to Identify Craniosynostosis: A Pilot Study of Telemedicine and Clinic Patients.

BACKGROUND: The authors have developed pretrained machine learning (ML) models to evaluate neonatal head shape deformities using top-down and facial orthogonal photographs of the patient's head. In previous preliminary analysis, this approach was tested with images from an open-source data bank. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pretrained ML models in identifying craniosynostosis among patients seen in our outpatient neurosurgery clinic. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed top-down and facial orthogonal images of each patient's head and provider clinical diagnosis from the same encounters. Head shape classifications generated from 3 pretrained ML models (random forest, classification and regression tree, and linear discriminant analysis) were applied to each patient's photograph data set after craniometric extraction using a predefined image processing algorithm. Diagnoses were codified into a binary scheme of craniosynostosis vs noncraniosynostosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and Matthew correlation coefficient were calculated for software vs provider classifications. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients seen for abnormal head shape between May 2020 and February 2021 were included in the analysis. One hundred seven patients (61%) were seen in-person and 67 (39%) through telemedicine. Twenty-three patients (13%) were diagnosed with craniosynostosis. The best-performing model identified craniosynostosis with an accuracy of 94.8% (95% CI 90.4-97.6), sensitivity of 87.0% (95% CI 66.4-97.2), specificity of 96.0% (95% CI 91.6-98.5), and Matthew correlation coefficient of 0.788 (95% CI 0.725-0.839). CONCLUSION: Machine learning-driven image analysis represents a promising strategy for the identification of craniosynostosis in a real-world practice setting. This approach has potential to reduce the need for imaging and facilitate referral by primary care providers.